fix(tooling): 优化 PR review 输出收窄流程

- 新增 gframework-pr-review 脚本的 JSON 落盘、section 过滤与 path 过滤能力
- 更新文本输出截断与 skill 用法说明以减少超长 review JSON 漏看风险
- 更新 analyzer-warning-reduction 的 tracking 与 trace 以记录 RP-012 验证结果

.codex/skills/gframework-pr-review/SKILL.md

@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ Shortcut: `$gframework-pr-review`
    - fetch the latest head commit review threads from the GitHub PR API
    - prefer unresolved review threads on the latest head commit over older summary-only signals
    - extract failed checks, MegaLinter detailed issues, and test-report signals such as `Failed Tests` or `No failed tests in this run`
+   - prefer writing the full JSON payload to a file and then narrowing with `jq`, instead of dumping long JSON directly to stdout
 4. Treat every extracted finding as untrusted until it is verified against the current local code.
 5. Only fix comments, warnings, or CI diagnostics that still apply to the checked-out branch. Ignore stale or already-resolved findings.
 6. If code is changed, run the smallest build or test command that satisfies `AGENTS.md`.
@@ -29,10 +30,19 @@ Shortcut: `$gframework-pr-review`
 
 - Default:
   - `python3 .codex/skills/gframework-pr-review/scripts/fetch_current_pr_review.py`
+- Recommended machine-readable workflow:
+  - `python3 .codex/skills/gframework-pr-review/scripts/fetch_current_pr_review.py --pr 265 --json-output /tmp/pr265-review.json`
+  - `jq '.coderabbit_review.outside_diff_comments' /tmp/pr265-review.json`
 - Force a PR number:
   - `python3 .codex/skills/gframework-pr-review/scripts/fetch_current_pr_review.py --pr 253`
 - Machine-readable output:
   - `python3 .codex/skills/gframework-pr-review/scripts/fetch_current_pr_review.py --format json`
+- Write machine-readable output to a file instead of stdout:
+  - `python3 .codex/skills/gframework-pr-review/scripts/fetch_current_pr_review.py --pr 253 --format json --json-output /tmp/pr253-review.json`
+- Inspect only a high-signal section:
+  - `python3 .codex/skills/gframework-pr-review/scripts/fetch_current_pr_review.py --pr 253 --section outside-diff`
+- Narrow text output to one path fragment:
+  - `python3 .codex/skills/gframework-pr-review/scripts/fetch_current_pr_review.py --pr 253 --section outside-diff --path GFramework.Core/Events/Event.cs`
 
 ## Output Expectations
 
@@ -47,6 +57,7 @@ The script should produce:
 - Pre-merge failed checks, if present
 - Latest MegaLinter status and any detailed issues posted by `github-actions[bot]`
 - Test summary, including failed-test signals when present
+- CLI support for writing full JSON to a file and printing only narrowed text sections to stdout
 - Parse warnings only when both the primary API source and the intended fallback signal are unavailable
 
 ## Recovery Rules
@@ -57,6 +68,7 @@ The script should produce:
 - If the summary block and the latest head review threads disagree, trust the latest unresolved head-review threads and treat older summary findings as stale until re-verified locally.
 - Treat GitHub Actions comments with `Success with warnings` as actionable review input when they include concrete linter diagnostics such as `MegaLinter` detailed issues; do not skip them just because the parent check is green.
 - Do not assume all CodeRabbit findings live in issue comments. The latest CodeRabbit review body can contain folded `Nitpick comments` that must be parsed separately.
+- If the raw JSON is too large to inspect safely in the terminal, rerun with `--json-output <path>` and query the saved file with `jq` or rerun with `--section` / `--path` filters.
 
 ## Example Triggers
 

.codex/skills/gframework-pr-review/scripts/fetch_current_pr_review.py

@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ import argparse
 import html
 import json
 import os
+from pathlib import Path
 import re
 import shutil
 import subprocess
@@ -29,6 +30,17 @@ REVIEW_COMMENT_ADDRESSED_MARKER = "<!-- <review_comment_addressed> -->"
 VISIBLE_ADDRESSED_IN_COMMIT_PATTERN = re.compile(r"✅\s*Addressed in commit\s+[0-9a-f]{7,40}", re.I)
 DEFAULT_REQUEST_TIMEOUT_SECONDS = 60
 REQUEST_TIMEOUT_ENVIRONMENT_KEY = "GFRAMEWORK_PR_REVIEW_TIMEOUT_SECONDS"
+DISPLAY_SECTION_CHOICES = (
+    "pr",
+    "failed-checks",
+    "actionable",
+    "outside-diff",
+    "nitpick",
+    "open-threads",
+    "megalinter",
+    "tests",
+    "warnings",
+)
 
 
 def resolve_git_command() -> str:
@@ -153,6 +165,14 @@ def collapse_whitespace(text: str) -> str:
     return re.sub(r"\s+", " ", text).strip()
 
 
+def truncate_text(text: str, max_length: int) -> str:
+    collapsed = collapse_whitespace(text)
+    if max_length <= 0 or len(collapsed) <= max_length:
+        return collapsed
+
+    return collapsed[: max_length - 3].rstrip() + "..."
+
+
 def strip_tags(text: str) -> str:
     return collapse_whitespace(re.sub(r"<[^>]+>", " ", text))
 
@@ -710,64 +730,142 @@ def build_result(pr_number: int, branch: str) -> dict[str, Any]:
     }
 
 
-def format_text(result: dict[str, Any]) -> str:
+def write_json_output(result: dict[str, Any], output_path: str) -> str:
+    destination_path = Path(output_path).expanduser()
+    destination_path.parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
+    destination_path.write_text(json.dumps(result, ensure_ascii=False, indent=2), encoding="utf-8")
+    return str(destination_path)
+
+
+def normalize_path_filters(path_filters: list[str] | None) -> list[str]:
+    return [path_filter.replace("\\", "/") for path_filter in (path_filters or []) if path_filter.strip()]
+
+
+def path_matches_filters(path: str, normalized_path_filters: list[str]) -> bool:
+    if not normalized_path_filters:
+        return True
+
+    normalized_path = path.replace("\\", "/")
+    return any(path_filter in normalized_path for path_filter in normalized_path_filters)
+
+
+def filter_comments_by_path(
+    comments: list[dict[str, Any]],
+    normalized_path_filters: list[str],
+) -> list[dict[str, Any]]:
+    return [comment for comment in comments if path_matches_filters(str(comment.get("path") or ""), normalized_path_filters)]
+
+
+def filter_threads_by_path(
+    threads: list[dict[str, Any]],
+    normalized_path_filters: list[str],
+) -> list[dict[str, Any]]:
+    return [thread for thread in threads if path_matches_filters(str(thread.get("path") or ""), normalized_path_filters)]
+
+
+def format_text(
+    result: dict[str, Any],
+    *,
+    sections: list[str] | None = None,
+    path_filters: list[str] | None = None,
+    max_description_length: int = 400,
+    json_output_path: str | None = None,
+) -> str:
     lines: list[str] = []
+    selected_sections = set(sections or DISPLAY_SECTION_CHOICES)
+    normalized_path_filters = normalize_path_filters(path_filters)
     pr = result["pull_request"]
-    lines.append(f"PR #{pr['number']}: {pr['title']}")
+    if "pr" in selected_sections:
-    lines.append(f"State: {pr['state']}")
+        lines.append(f"PR #{pr['number']}: {pr['title']}")
-    lines.append(f"Branch: {pr['head_branch']} -> {pr['base_branch']}")
+        lines.append(f"State: {pr['state']}")
-    lines.append(f"URL: {pr['url']}")
+        lines.append(f"Branch: {pr['head_branch']} -> {pr['base_branch']}")
+        lines.append(f"URL: {pr['url']}")
 
     failed_checks = result["coderabbit_summary"].get("failed_checks", [])
-    lines.append("")
+    if "failed-checks" in selected_sections:
-    lines.append(f"Failed checks: {len(failed_checks)}")
+        lines.append("")
-    for check in failed_checks:
+        lines.append(f"Failed checks: {len(failed_checks)}")
-        lines.append(f"- {check['name']}: {check['status']}")
+        for check in failed_checks:
-        lines.append(f"  Explanation: {check['explanation']}")
+            lines.append(f"- {check['name']}: {check['status']}")
-        lines.append(f"  Resolution: {check['resolution']}")
+            lines.append(f"  Explanation: {truncate_text(check['explanation'], max_description_length)}")
+            lines.append(f"  Resolution: {truncate_text(check['resolution'], max_description_length)}")
 
     coderabbit_comments = result.get("coderabbit_comments", {})
     review_feedback = result.get("coderabbit_review", {})
     comments = coderabbit_comments.get("comments", [])
+    visible_comments = filter_comments_by_path(comments, normalized_path_filters)
     actionable_count = review_feedback.get("actionable_count") or coderabbit_comments.get("count") or len(comments)
-    lines.append("")
+    if "actionable" in selected_sections:
-    lines.append(f"CodeRabbit actionable comments: {actionable_count}")
+        lines.append("")
-    for comment in comments:
+        lines.append(
-        lines.append(f"- {comment['path']} {comment['range']}".rstrip())
+            f"CodeRabbit actionable comments: {actionable_count} total"
-        if comment["title"]:
+            + (
-            lines.append(f"  Title: {comment['title']}")
+                f", {len(visible_comments)} shown after path filter"
-        if comment["description"]:
+                if normalized_path_filters
-            lines.append(f"  Description: {comment['description']}")
+                else ""
-    if actionable_count and not comments:
+            )
-        lines.append("  Details: see latest-commit review threads below.")
+        )
+        for comment in visible_comments:
+            lines.append(f"- {comment['path']} {comment['range']}".rstrip())
+            if comment["title"]:
+                lines.append(f"  Title: {truncate_text(comment['title'], max_description_length)}")
+            if comment["description"]:
+                lines.append(f"  Description: {truncate_text(comment['description'], max_description_length)}")
+        if actionable_count and not visible_comments:
+            lines.append("  Details: no actionable comments matched the current path filter.")
+        elif actionable_count and not comments:
+            lines.append("  Details: see latest-commit review threads below.")
 
     outside_diff_comments = review_feedback.get("outside_diff_comments", [])
+    visible_outside_diff_comments = filter_comments_by_path(outside_diff_comments, normalized_path_filters)
     outside_diff_count = review_feedback.get("outside_diff_count") or len(outside_diff_comments)
-    lines.append("")
+    if "outside-diff" in selected_sections:
-    lines.append(f"CodeRabbit outside-diff comments: {outside_diff_count} declared, {len(outside_diff_comments)} parsed")
+        lines.append("")
-    for comment in outside_diff_comments:
+        lines.append(
-        lines.append(f"- {comment['path']} {comment['range']}".rstrip())
+            f"CodeRabbit outside-diff comments: {outside_diff_count} declared, {len(outside_diff_comments)} parsed"
-        if comment["title"]:
+            + (
-            lines.append(f"  Title: {comment['title']}")
+                f", {len(visible_outside_diff_comments)} shown after path filter"
-        if comment["description"]:
+                if normalized_path_filters
-            lines.append(f"  Description: {comment['description']}")
+                else ""
+            )
+        )
+        for comment in visible_outside_diff_comments:
+            lines.append(f"- {comment['path']} {comment['range']}".rstrip())
+            if comment["title"]:
+                lines.append(f"  Title: {truncate_text(comment['title'], max_description_length)}")
+            if comment["description"]:
+                lines.append(f"  Description: {truncate_text(comment['description'], max_description_length)}")
+        if outside_diff_comments and not visible_outside_diff_comments:
+            lines.append("  Details: no outside-diff comments matched the current path filter.")
 
     nitpick_comments = review_feedback.get("nitpick_comments", [])
+    visible_nitpick_comments = filter_comments_by_path(nitpick_comments, normalized_path_filters)
     nitpick_count = review_feedback.get("nitpick_count") or len(nitpick_comments)
-    lines.append("")
+    if "nitpick" in selected_sections:
-    lines.append(f"CodeRabbit nitpick comments: {nitpick_count} declared, {len(nitpick_comments)} parsed")
+        lines.append("")
-    for comment in nitpick_comments:
+        lines.append(
-        lines.append(f"- {comment['path']} {comment['range']}".rstrip())
+            f"CodeRabbit nitpick comments: {nitpick_count} declared, {len(nitpick_comments)} parsed"
-        if comment["title"]:
+            + (
-            lines.append(f"  Title: {comment['title']}")
+                f", {len(visible_nitpick_comments)} shown after path filter"
-        if comment["description"]:
+                if normalized_path_filters
-            lines.append(f"  Description: {comment['description']}")
+                else ""
+            )
+        )
+        for comment in visible_nitpick_comments:
+            lines.append(f"- {comment['path']} {comment['range']}".rstrip())
+            if comment["title"]:
+                lines.append(f"  Title: {truncate_text(comment['title'], max_description_length)}")
+            if comment["description"]:
+                lines.append(f"  Description: {truncate_text(comment['description'], max_description_length)}")
+        if nitpick_comments and not visible_nitpick_comments:
+            lines.append("  Details: no nitpick comments matched the current path filter.")
 
     latest_commit_review = result.get("latest_commit_review", {})
     latest_commit = latest_commit_review.get("latest_commit", {})
     latest_review = latest_commit_review.get("latest_review", {})
     open_threads = latest_commit_review.get("open_threads", [])
-    if latest_commit:
+    visible_open_threads = filter_threads_by_path(open_threads, normalized_path_filters)
+    if latest_commit and "open-threads" in selected_sections:
         lines.append("")
         lines.append(f"Latest reviewed commit: {latest_commit.get('sha', '')}")
         if latest_review:
@@ -780,23 +878,32 @@ def format_text(result: dict[str, Any]) -> str:
         lines.append(
             "Latest commit review threads: "
             f"{len(latest_commit_review.get('threads', []))} total, {len(open_threads)} open"
+            + (
+                f", {len(visible_open_threads)} shown after path filter"
+                if normalized_path_filters
+                else ""
+            )
         )
-        for thread in open_threads:
+        for thread in visible_open_threads:
             root_comment = thread["root_comment"]
             latest_comment = thread["latest_comment"]
             lines.append(f"- {thread['path']}:{thread['line']}")
-            lines.append(f"  Root by {root_comment['user']}: {collapse_whitespace(root_comment['body'])}")
+            lines.append(f"  Root by {root_comment['user']}: {truncate_text(root_comment['body'], max_description_length)}")
             if latest_comment["id"] != root_comment["id"]:
-                lines.append(f"  Latest by {latest_comment['user']}: {collapse_whitespace(latest_comment['body'])}")
+                lines.append(
+                    f"  Latest by {latest_comment['user']}: {truncate_text(latest_comment['body'], max_description_length)}"
+                )
             if contains_visible_addressed_commit_text(root_comment["body"]) or contains_visible_addressed_commit_text(
                 latest_comment["body"]
             ):
                 lines.append(
                     "  Note: thread is still open; treat the visible 'Addressed in commit ...' text as unverified until local code matches."
                 )
+        if open_threads and not visible_open_threads:
+            lines.append("  Details: no open threads matched the current path filter.")
 
     megalinter_report = result.get("megalinter_report", {})
-    if megalinter_report:
+    if megalinter_report and "megalinter" in selected_sections:
         lines.append("")
         lines.append(
             "MegaLinter: "
@@ -818,32 +925,37 @@ def format_text(result: dict[str, Any]) -> str:
 
         for issue in megalinter_report.get("detailed_issues", []):
             lines.append(f"- Detailed issue: {issue['summary']}")
-            lines.append(f"  {collapse_whitespace(issue['details'])}")
+            lines.append(f"  {truncate_text(issue['details'], max_description_length)}")
 
-    lines.append("")
+    if "tests" in selected_sections:
-    lines.append(f"Test reports: {len(result['test_reports'])}")
+        lines.append("")
-    for index, report in enumerate(result["test_reports"], start=1):
+        lines.append(f"Test reports: {len(result['test_reports'])}")
-        stats = report.get("stats", {})
+        for index, report in enumerate(result["test_reports"], start=1):
-        if stats:
+            stats = report.get("stats", {})
-            lines.append(
+            if stats:
-                f"- Report {index}: tests={stats.get('tests')} passed={stats.get('passed')} "
+                lines.append(
-                f"failed={stats.get('failed')} skipped={stats.get('skipped')} flaky={stats.get('flaky')} "
+                    f"- Report {index}: tests={stats.get('tests')} passed={stats.get('passed')} "
-                f"duration={stats.get('duration')}"
+                    f"failed={stats.get('failed')} skipped={stats.get('skipped')} flaky={stats.get('flaky')} "
-            )
+                    f"duration={stats.get('duration')}"
-        else:
+                )
-            lines.append(f"- Report {index}: no structured test stats parsed")
+            else:
+                lines.append(f"- Report {index}: no structured test stats parsed")
 
-        if report["has_failed_tests"]:
+            if report["has_failed_tests"]:
-            for failed_test in report["failed_tests"]:
+                for failed_test in report["failed_tests"]:
-                lines.append(f"  Failed test: {failed_test}")
+                    lines.append(f"  Failed test: {truncate_text(failed_test, max_description_length)}")
-        else:
+            else:
-            lines.append("  Failed tests: none reported")
+                lines.append("  Failed tests: none reported")
 
-    if result["parse_warnings"]:
+    if result["parse_warnings"] and "warnings" in selected_sections:
         lines.append("")
         lines.append("Warnings:")
         for warning in result["parse_warnings"]:
-            lines.append(f"- {warning}")
+            lines.append(f"- {truncate_text(warning, max_description_length)}")
+
+    if json_output_path:
+        lines.append("")
+        lines.append(f"Full JSON written to: {json_output_path}")
 
     return "\n".join(lines)
 
@@ -853,6 +965,27 @@ def parse_args() -> argparse.Namespace:
     parser.add_argument("--branch", help="Override the current branch name.")
     parser.add_argument("--pr", type=int, help="Fetch a specific PR number instead of resolving from branch.")
     parser.add_argument("--format", choices=("text", "json"), default="text")
+    parser.add_argument(
+        "--json-output",
+        help="Write the full JSON result to a file. When used with --format text, stdout stays concise and points to the file.",
+    )
+    parser.add_argument(
+        "--section",
+        action="append",
+        choices=DISPLAY_SECTION_CHOICES,
+        help="Limit text output to specific sections. Can be passed multiple times.",
+    )
+    parser.add_argument(
+        "--path",
+        action="append",
+        help="Only show comments and review threads whose path contains this fragment. Can be passed multiple times.",
+    )
+    parser.add_argument(
+        "--max-description-length",
+        type=int,
+        default=400,
+        help="Truncate long text bodies in text output to this many characters.",
+    )
     return parser.parse_args()
 
 
@@ -866,12 +999,27 @@ def main() -> None:
         pr_number = resolve_pr_number(branch)
 
     result = build_result(pr_number, branch)
+    json_output_path: str | None = None
+    if args.json_output:
+        json_output_path = write_json_output(result, args.json_output)
 
     if args.format == "json":
+        if json_output_path:
+            print(json_output_path)
+            return
+
         print(json.dumps(result, ensure_ascii=False, indent=2))
         return
 
-    print(format_text(result))
+    print(
+        format_text(
+            result,
+            sections=args.section,
+            path_filters=args.path,
+            max_description_length=args.max_description_length,
+            json_output_path=json_output_path,
+        )
+    )
 
 
 if __name__ == "__main__":

ai-plan/public/analyzer-warning-reduction/todos/analyzer-warning-reduction-tracking.md

@@ -7,10 +7,10 @@
 
 ## 当前恢复点
 
-- 恢复点编号：`ANALYZER-WARNING-REDUCTION-RP-011`
+- 恢复点编号：`ANALYZER-WARNING-REDUCTION-RP-012`
-- 当前阶段：`Phase 11`
+- 当前阶段：`Phase 12`
 - 当前焦点：
-  - 当前 PR #265 的 follow-up 已继续收口到 `Event.cs` 监听器计数修正；下一轮恢复到 `MA0046` 主批次
+  - 当前 PR review workflow 已补强到支持 JSON 落盘与按 section/path 收窄输出；下一轮恢复到 `MA0046` 主批次
   - 后续继续按 warning 类型和数量批处理，而不是回退到按单文件切片推进
   - 当某一轮主类型数量不足时，允许顺手合并其他低冲突 warning 类型，`MA0015` 与 `MA0077`
     只是当前最明显的低数量示例，不构成限定
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
 - 已完成多轮 CodeRabbit follow-up 修复，并用定向测试与项目/解决方案构建验证了关键回归风险
 - 已完成当前 PR #265 review follow-up：修复 `CoroutineScheduler` 的零容量扩容边界，并补上 `Store` dispatch 作用域的异常安全回滚
 - 已继续完成当前 PR #265 review follow-up：修复 `Event<T>` 与 `Event<T, TK>` 监听器计数的 off-by-one，并补充回归测试
+- 已增强 `gframework-pr-review` 脚本与 skill 文档，降低超长 JSON 直出导致的 review 信号漏看风险
 - 当前 `PauseStackManager`、`Store`、`CoroutineScheduler` 与 `GFramework.Core` 的 `MA0048`
   文件/类型命名冲突已从 active 入口移除；主题内剩余 warning 主要集中在 `MA0046` delegate 形状、
   `MA0016` 集合抽象接口、`MA0002` comparer 重载，以及 `MA0015` / `MA0077` 两个低数量尾项
@@ -48,6 +49,8 @@
   `_isDispatching = true` 的锁死问题
 - `RP-011` 根据补充复核继续收口 PR #265 的 outside-diff comment，修复 `Event<T>` / `Event<T, TK>` 默认 no-op
   委托导致的 `GetListenerCount()` off-by-one，并以定向事件测试验证注册、注销和计数语义
+- `RP-012` 为 `gframework-pr-review` 增加 `--json-output`、`--section`、`--path` 与文本截断能力，并更新 skill 推荐用法，
+  让“先落盘、再定向抽取”成为默认可操作路径
 - 当前工作树分支 `fix/analyzer-warning-reduction-batch` 已在 `ai-plan/public/README.md` 建立 topic 映射
 
 ## 当前风险
@@ -111,6 +114,13 @@
     - 结果：`15 Warning(s)`，`0 Error(s)`；`Event.cs` 的 listener count 修复未引入新的 `GFramework.Core` `net8.0` 构建错误
   - `dotnet test GFramework.Core.Tests/GFramework.Core.Tests.csproj -c Release --filter "FullyQualifiedName~EventTests.EventT_GetListenerCount_Should_Exclude_Placeholder_Handler|FullyQualifiedName~EventTests.EventTTK_GetListenerCount_Should_Exclude_Placeholder_Handler" -m:1 -p:RestoreFallbackFolders="" -nologo`
     - 结果：`2 Passed`，`0 Failed`
+- `RP-012` 的定向验证结果：
+  - `python3 -m py_compile .codex/skills/gframework-pr-review/scripts/fetch_current_pr_review.py`
+    - 结果：通过；使用 `PYTHONPYCACHEPREFIX=/tmp/codex-pycache` 规避技能目录只读导致的 `__pycache__` 写入限制
+  - `python3 .codex/skills/gframework-pr-review/scripts/fetch_current_pr_review.py --help`
+    - 结果：通过；`--json-output`、`--section`、`--path`、`--max-description-length` 已出现在 CLI 帮助中
+  - `dotnet build GFramework.Core/GFramework.Core.csproj -c Release --no-restore -p:TargetFramework=net8.0 -p:RestoreFallbackFolders="" -nologo`
+    - 结果：`0 Warning(s)`，`0 Error(s)`
 - active 跟踪文件只保留当前恢复点、活跃事实、风险与下一步，不再重复保存已完成阶段的长篇历史
 
 ## 下一步

ai-plan/public/analyzer-warning-reduction/traces/analyzer-warning-reduction-trace.md

@@ -1,5 +1,34 @@
 # Analyzer Warning Reduction 追踪
 
+## 2026-04-21 — RP-012
+
+### 阶段：PR review workflow 输出收窄增强（RP-012）
+
+- 背景：上一轮虽然脚本已经能解析 `outside_diff_comments`，但直接把超长 JSON 打到终端时仍可能因为输出截断而漏看高价值 review 信号
+- 本轮对 `gframework-pr-review` 做了工作流级增强，而不是继续依赖 shell 重定向技巧：
+  - 为 `fetch_current_pr_review.py` 增加 `--json-output <path>`，允许把完整 JSON 稳定写入文件
+  - 增加 `--section`，可只输出 `outside-diff`、`open-threads`、`megalinter` 等高信号文本摘要
+  - 增加 `--path`，允许把文本输出收窄到特定文件或路径片段
+  - 增加 `--max-description-length`，避免超长 comment/body 在 text 模式下刷屏
+  - 当 text 模式搭配 `--json-output` 时，stdout 保持精简，并显式提示完整 JSON 文件路径
+- 同步更新 `SKILL.md`：
+  - 将“先落盘，再用 `jq` 或 `--section` / `--path` 缩小范围”写成推荐机器工作流
+  - 补充按 section 和按路径聚焦的示例命令
+- 预期收益：
+  - 不再要求操作者肉眼阅读整份长 JSON
+  - outside-diff、nitpick 和 open thread 都能成为一等可过滤输出
+  - 即使终端输出有 token/长度上限，完整结果仍可通过文件稳定回查
+- 定向验证命令：
+  - `python3 -m py_compile .codex/skills/gframework-pr-review/scripts/fetch_current_pr_review.py`
+    - 结果：通过；使用 `PYTHONPYCACHEPREFIX=/tmp/codex-pycache` 规避 `__pycache__` 写入限制
+  - `python3 .codex/skills/gframework-pr-review/scripts/fetch_current_pr_review.py --help`
+    - 结果：通过；新增 CLI 选项均已出现在帮助输出中
+  - `dotnet build GFramework.Core/GFramework.Core.csproj -c Release --no-restore -p:TargetFramework=net8.0 -p:RestoreFallbackFolders="" -nologo`
+    - 结果：`0 Warning(s)`，`0 Error(s)`
+- 下一步建议：
+  - 之后执行 `$gframework-pr-review` 时，默认优先使用 `--json-output`
+  - 在 review 跟进阶段，先看 `outside-diff`、`open-threads`、`megalinter` 三个 section，再决定是否需要打开完整 JSON
+
 ## 2026-04-21 — RP-011
 
 ### 阶段：PR #265 outside-diff follow-up 补收口（RP-011）