GFramework/ai-plan/public/documentation-governance-and-refresh/todos/documentation-governance-and-refresh-tracking.md
gewuyou 310aeafa57 docs(ai-plan): 收口文档治理恢复入口
- 归档 documentation-governance-and-refresh 截至 2026-04-22 的跟踪与 trace 历史

- 更新 active tracking 与 trace,只保留恢复点、风险、验证结果和下一步

- 补充 Godot 栏目稳定性复核后的归档决策与 PR #268 follow-up 入口
2026-04-22 14:23:15 +08:00

69 lines
4.7 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

# Documentation Governance And Refresh 跟踪
## 目标
继续以“文档必须可追溯到源码、测试与真实接入方式”为原则,维护 `GFramework` 的仓库入口、模块入口与
`docs/zh-CN` 采用链路,避免 README、专题页与教程再次偏离当前实现。
## 当前恢复点
- 恢复点编号:`DOCUMENTATION-GOVERNANCE-REFRESH-RP-018`
- 当前阶段:`Phase 3`
- 当前焦点:
- Godot 栏目本轮重写页已完成稳定性复核,当前可把详细实施历史迁入 `archive/`
- active tracking / trace 已收口为默认 `boot` 可直接恢复的最小入口
- 下一次推送后需要重新执行 PR #268 review 跟进,确认 CodeRabbit / Greptile open thread 是否继续收敛
## 当前状态摘要
- `docs/zh-CN/godot/` 当前高优先级页面集已完成源码优先收口:
`index.md``architecture.md``scene.md``ui.md``signal.md``extensions.md``logging.md`
- `docs/zh-CN/tutorials/godot-integration.md` 已与当前包关系、生成器协作顺序和运行时边界对齐
- 本轮再次执行页面级校验与 `docs` 站点构建,结果均通过
- 当前主题保持 active但 active 文档已不再承载大段历史,只保留恢复所需事实与下一步
## 当前活跃事实
- 当前分支 `docs/sdk-update-documentation` 仍映射到 `documentation-governance-and-refresh`
- 当前 worktree 下未发现 `ai-plan/private/` 恢复目录,本主题以 public artifacts 作为唯一恢复入口
- 本轮新增归档:
- `ai-plan/public/documentation-governance-and-refresh/archive/todos/documentation-governance-and-refresh-history-through-2026-04-22.md`
- `ai-plan/public/documentation-governance-and-refresh/archive/traces/documentation-governance-and-refresh-history-through-2026-04-22.md`
- 2026-04-22 之前的长篇历史已存在于 2026-04-18 与 RP-001 through RP-008 的归档文件中
- 当前待处理事项已经从“继续重写 Godot 页面”切换为“等待下一次推送后的 PR review follow-up”
## 当前风险
- review 跟进遗漏风险:如果下一次推送后未重新抓取 PR #268 的 latest-head open threads可能会错过新一轮
CodeRabbit / Greptile 意见
- 缓解措施:推送后优先执行 `$gframework-pr-review`,以 unresolved thread 数量变化作为下一步入口
- active 文档再次膨胀风险:如果后续把细节实施记录继续直接追加到 active 文件,会重新削弱 `boot` 的恢复效率
- 缓解措施:阶段性结果先写入 `archive/`active 只保留恢复点、活跃事实、风险、验证和下一步
- 文档回漂风险:若后续修改 README 或专题页时跳过源码 / 测试核对,可能把旧教程里的叙述重新写回当前页面
- 缓解措施:继续维持“源码 / 测试 / `*.csproj` 优先,`ai-libs/` 只补 adoption path”的证据顺序
## 活跃文档
- 当前 trace[documentation-governance-and-refresh-trace.md](../traces/documentation-governance-and-refresh-trace.md)
- 2026-04-22 跟踪归档:[documentation-governance-and-refresh-history-through-2026-04-22.md](../archive/todos/documentation-governance-and-refresh-history-through-2026-04-22.md)
- 2026-04-22 trace 归档:[documentation-governance-and-refresh-history-through-2026-04-22.md](../archive/traces/documentation-governance-and-refresh-history-through-2026-04-22.md)
- 2026-04-18 历史归档:[documentation-governance-and-refresh-history-through-2026-04-18.md](../archive/todos/documentation-governance-and-refresh-history-through-2026-04-18.md)
- RP-001 到 RP-008 trace 归档:[documentation-governance-and-refresh-rp-001-through-rp-008.md](../archive/traces/documentation-governance-and-refresh-rp-001-through-rp-008.md)
## 验证说明
- `bash .agents/skills/gframework-doc-refresh/scripts/validate-all.sh docs/zh-CN/godot/index.md`
- `bash .agents/skills/gframework-doc-refresh/scripts/validate-all.sh docs/zh-CN/godot/architecture.md`
- `bash .agents/skills/gframework-doc-refresh/scripts/validate-all.sh docs/zh-CN/godot/scene.md`
- `bash .agents/skills/gframework-doc-refresh/scripts/validate-all.sh docs/zh-CN/godot/ui.md`
- `bash .agents/skills/gframework-doc-refresh/scripts/validate-all.sh docs/zh-CN/godot/signal.md`
- `bash .agents/skills/gframework-doc-refresh/scripts/validate-all.sh docs/zh-CN/godot/extensions.md`
- `bash .agents/skills/gframework-doc-refresh/scripts/validate-all.sh docs/zh-CN/godot/logging.md`
- `bash .agents/skills/gframework-doc-refresh/scripts/validate-all.sh docs/zh-CN/tutorials/godot-integration.md`
- `cd docs && bun run build`
## 下一步
1. 下一次推送后执行 `$gframework-pr-review`,确认 PR #268 的 CodeRabbit / Greptile unresolved threads 是否继续减少
2. 如果 review 已收敛且没有新增文档偏差,再评估是否将整个 topic 迁入 `ai-plan/public/archive/`